Bronchodilation in infants with malacia or recurrent wheeze.

BACKGROUND Controversy remains regarding the effectiveness of bronchodilators in wheezy infants. AIMS To assess the effect of inhaled beta(2) agonists on lung function in infants with malacia or recurrent wheeze, and to determine whether a negative effect of beta(2) agonists on forced expiratory flow (V'(maxFRC)) is more pronounced in infants with airway malacia, compared to infants with wheeze. METHODS We retrospectively analysed lung function data of 27 infants: eight with malacia, 19 with recurrent wheeze. Mean (SD) age was 51 (18) weeks. Mean V'(maxFRC) (in Z score) was assessed before and after inhalation of beta(2) agonists. RESULTS Baseline V'(maxFRC) was below reference values for both groups. Following inhalation of beta(2) agonists the mean (95% CI) change in mean V'(maxFRC) in Z scores was -0.10 (-0.26 to 0.05) and -0.33 (-0.55 to -0.11) for the malacia and wheeze group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In infants with wheeze, inhaled beta(2) agonists caused a significant reduction in mean V'(maxFRC). Infants with malacia were not more likely to worsen after beta(2) agonists than were infants with recurrent wheeze.